5/11/20 - "War is Not a Triumph" Rather, any war would indicate a fundamental failure amongst human-kind to achieve a harmonious existence, a stark display of their incapacity to communicate and use reason. But, as is very obvious whenever American propaganda rears its ugly head, no one even really considered communication as a means of resolution, or physical battle as a last resort. Rather, guns and bombs are our "go-to". If someone even challenges the status quo in the world's social order, they are likely a terrorist, and a violent response is appropriate. Who the fuck decided what was "appropriate" in this raging, animal society??? I say, "War is not a triumph. You must be deluded. No one should be receiving a 'Medal of Honor' for helping annihilate 'the enemy', and the mere fact that soldiers are awarded such prestige only sets up a continuing situation." What's the objective in the popular video game "Medal of Honor"? I haven't really played it (although I am a seasoned-pro in the area of video games), but I'm fairly certain that the game awards you that "honor" for killing as many American enemies as you possibly can. (Holy shit! Culture is sociopathic! It never questions itself, and only tries to revel in the GLORY of mass hysteria!) My challenge to the cultural ideology is simply this: You are not a winner for homocidally demanding control. Whenever you chop off someone's head, for the sake of your own insane pride, someone has noticed... And they will want to retaliate, naturally. You CAN NOT, therefore, "win" through violent wars. In any war, I never take a side. There is ALWAYS something wrong with both sides, and neither side has a right to attack the other. It boils down to simple immaturity. Rather than reason out (as is ALWAYS possible) a peaceful resolution to their problems, the maniac grown-babies engage theirselves in a death-match, attempting to solve the problem with simplistic elimination. As we well-know, the babies that start the wars never really fight in them, protecting theirselves at home, and sucking their thumbs. Instead, somehow, they've effectively persuaded and deluded an ignorant population into doing their dirty work for them... And our boys are proudly losing their limbs for the sake of a rich-brat's tantrums! You'll see the truth: "Rich-brat tantrums? These are well-founded problems with no other resolution, Nick! How dare you suggest that our leaders in the media and government are completely incompetent!" The problems identified in popular news are always an ideological development. Meaning, they are a self-perpetuating monster, of sorts. Once they gain ground in the consensus conscious, it is very hard to wrap a lasso around the beast. Totally charged up and sucking down fuel more or less constantly, the bull charges straight into its imaginary problem, using whatever means necessary. Brutal retaliation is standard protocol, so don't fuck with U.S.! "Why do you say 'imaginary'??? How can you not see that we have enemies who are even more violent then us, not to mention, malicious?" Yes, the problems that you create are real, and you're only making them worse. I firmly declare the solution to war is peace. You can't achieve peace with violence, you stubborn dolt. You have violent enemies? Well, find out what's bothering them! It doesn't seem possible to me that any human force should be ruling itself in a total absence of reason. Meaning, you need to find out why they have such a death-wish. And, if you are wrong, then you have to admit wrong-doing, to begin to achieve the peace that you so CLAIM to desire. I can vouch for the religious extremists, without condoning their violence. They feel a great zeal against your state for a reason, and as long as you deny that, your claims that you all "Pray for Peace" are totally fraudulent. Sorry. |